CeasarScience Risk Management Table

CeasarScience Risk Management Table

Topic	Mainstream Science	CeasarScience	Grok Analysis
Yellowstone Eruption Probability (2066)	~0.00014% annual risk; no eruption expected in 2066	Entropy 91–95 threshold may indicate critical phase within Ceasar7	Recognizes Ceasar logic, but doesn't fully validate 2066 specificity
Tritium + Magma Volatility	Unrecognized; no published model links tritium to eruptions	Hydrogen isotope near magma may trigger or amplify phreatomagmatic events	Acknowledges novelty; awaits modeling and peer verification
Lake Tahoe / Secondary Systems	No known link to Yellowstone; distant seismic risk only	Possible entropy or isotopic resonance; drain plans suggested	Notes “unconfirmed” status; emphasizes regional monitoring
Volcanic Early Warning	Relies on LP earthquakes, deformation, gas emissions	Entropy drops, harmonic windows, and Codex resonance used as early indicators	Compatible with machine learning upgrades, but not default logic
Indigenous Science Integration	Not widely used; often omitted in technical briefings	Dresden Codex, Venus-Uranus harmonics, and Maya entropy cycles embedded	Recognizes cultural value, but underutilized in modeling
Public Response	Dismissive of speculative dates; emphasizes geological stability	Spiritual intuition + entropy modeling suggests proactive monitoring by 2028–2066	Neutral; receptive to entropy timelines but cautious about public alarms

Document Timestamp: July 26, 2025 – Ceasar Montez Research Archive
CeasarScience Validation Tags: #Entropy91, #TritiumFusion, #CodexResonance, #UNDRIPArticle31