Active Entropy Handshake — Two-Domain (Asymmetric) Model
What this is: a visualization of two domains that each evolve with their own gravity/expansion histories, isolation points, and harmonic cycles, softly coupled near the boundary by an active entropy exchange. There is no time-reversal symmetry here; direction of exchange ≠ rewinding time.
Interpretation: Two instruments improvising in harmony, not mirror tapes. The boundary mediates energy/entropy transfer without requiring atoms to “unbreak” or movies to play backward.
Preface — In my words
On July 17, 2025 the Ceasar7 harmonic flagged a boundary event. People asked me if that means “time runs backward.” It doesn’t. The active entropy boundary is a regulator — not a rewind button. Two domains can trade entropy without mirroring each other or repairing atoms like a VHS in reverse.
This page shows my working picture: asymmetric, coupled domains with their own gravity, isolation points, and rhythms. The coupling is local and directional. I anchor the Ceasar7 cycle at 9.0 years with the phase set so that t = 0 (2025‑07‑17) is a crest event; expected side lobes land near 2016 and 2034 in our clock. Use this as a visual aid — the observables below are how we test it.
Asymmetric dynamics (no mirroring)
Domain U (ours) carries a July 17, 2025 Ceasar7Shock-like dip; Domain V’s isolation event is offset (~2.4 years in our clock) with a weaker shock and different harmonic period/phase. A narrow coupling kernel at the boundary nudges the rates but does not force identity.
Key takeaways
- Different gravities & histories: H0, harmonic period, phase, and shock timing can differ across domains.
- Boundary = active entropy agent: the “handshake” transfers/neutralizes entropy locally; it doesn’t force a mirrored replay.
- Direction ≠ time reversal: opposite-signed activity indicates net flow, not atoms running backward.
How to test (observables)
- Low‑z wiggle in w(a) or H(z) (8–12‑year scale) centered near 2025; check SN Ia residuals & DESI BAO low‑z.
- ISW bump in CMB×LSS cross‑correlation tied to the transient slow‑down around the boundary.
- Growth-rate dip→rebound in fσ8(z) from RSD/peculiar velocities at z ≲ 0.3.
- Parity‑odd low‑ℓ template in CMB TT/TE/EE with sign fixed by the exchange direction.
No comments:
Post a Comment